53.2%
of records are in Visalia
Visalia is the largest center by count and rate. The other seven communities together contribute 140 records, so the county pattern is concentrated but not singular.
Tulare County · provider records and access indicators
Visalia contains just over half of the provider records and has the highest rate in the eight-community comparison. Exeter has the lowest rate, and every tracked community has at least one record.
Key findings
53.2%
Visalia is the largest center by count and rate. The other seven communities together contribute 140 records, so the county pattern is concentrated but not singular.
72.1%
The tracked communities represent about 72% of the county estimate. Rural areas and places outside the report remain outside the rate.
26
Four specialist groups appear among 26 records, led by orthodontics. No pediatric-dentistry or prosthodontics record matches the tracked communities.
Where records are located
The bars compare active NPI-1 records per 10,000 residents. A higher registry rate does not establish shorter waits, broader insurance participation, or more available appointments.
Population scope
The tracked communities represent about 72% of the county estimate. Rural areas and places outside the report remain outside the rate.
The numerator and denominator cover the same named communities. Using the full county population with this partial location count would understate the rate.
The calculation does not measure appointment capacity, patient travel, office hours, insurance participation, or dentists who serve county residents from another city.
Specialty record
Four specialist groups appear among 26 records, led by orthodontics. No pediatric-dentistry or prosthodontics record matches the tracked communities.
These categories come from provider-selected NPPES taxonomies. They are not a count of specialists accepting patients.
Federal shortage context
14
HRSA shortage designations use federal criteria and can apply to an area, a population group, or a facility. They complement the city-level NPI count but do not use the same denominator.
Review the HRSA source ↗Regional context
Tulare County ranks 10 of 18 current county reports by combined provider-record rate.
This is context, not a quality ranking. Each county rate covers only the named communities shown in its report, and population coverage varies.
| County report | Records | Per 10k | Population covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stanislaus County | 406 | 9.1 | 80.4% |
| Kings County | 111 | 9.0 | 79.8% |
| Tulare County | 299 | 8.5 | 72.1% |
| Solano County | 238 | 8.3 | 63.1% |
| Yolo County | 159 | 8.3 | 84.6% |
Community comparison
Counts use active individual NPI records with a dental taxonomy and a matching California practice-location city. Directory practices are shown separately for navigation.
Incorporated city · Population 26,566
Incorporated city · Population 10,287
Incorporated city · Population 10,338
Incorporated city · Population 12,712
Incorporated city · Population 63,719
Incorporated city · Population 72,936
Incorporated city · Population 148,302
Incorporated city · Population 8,168
Method
Use CMS NPPES NPI-1 records with a California practice location.
Retain active records whose taxonomy code begins with 1223.
Match each practice-location city to one of the 8 places in this report.
Divide each record count by that community's published population.
Show directory office profiles as a distinct navigation count.
Primary sources
Provider and taxonomy snapshot collected September 15, 2026.
January 1, 2026 city and county estimates; 2020 Census populations for census-designated places.
Dental shortage designations dated September 1, 2026.
Find an office
Practice profiles include locations, contact details, services, and other sourced information where available.
Questions about the report