96.6%
of records are in Yuba City
The county view is effectively centered in Yuba City, which holds almost 97% of the records shown.
Sutter County · provider records and access indicators
Yuba City contains 86 of the 89 provider records in this two-community report. Live Oak has three records and a rate roughly one-quarter of Yuba City's.
Key findings
96.6%
The county view is effectively centered in Yuba City, which holds almost 97% of the records shown.
80.0%
Yuba City and Live Oak represent four-fifths of the county population estimate. Residents elsewhere in Sutter County are excluded from the rate.
11
Five specialist groups appear among 11 records, led by orthodontics. No prosthodontics record matches either city.
Where records are located
The bars compare active NPI-1 records per 10,000 residents. A higher registry rate does not establish shorter waits, broader insurance participation, or more available appointments.
Population scope
Yuba City and Live Oak represent four-fifths of the county population estimate. Residents elsewhere in Sutter County are excluded from the rate.
The numerator and denominator cover the same named communities. Using the full county population with this partial location count would understate the rate.
The calculation does not measure appointment capacity, patient travel, office hours, insurance participation, or dentists who serve county residents from another city.
Specialty record
Five specialist groups appear among 11 records, led by orthodontics. No prosthodontics record matches either city.
These categories come from provider-selected NPPES taxonomies. They are not a count of specialists accepting patients.
Federal shortage context
2
HRSA shortage designations use federal criteria and can apply to an area, a population group, or a facility. They complement the city-level NPI count but do not use the same denominator.
Review the HRSA source ↗Regional context
Sutter County ranks 6 of 18 current county reports by combined provider-record rate.
This is context, not a quality ranking. Each county rate covers only the named communities shown in its report, and population coverage varies.
| County report | Records | Per 10k | Population covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sacramento County | 1,206 | 11.8 | 63.0% |
| Shasta County | 131 | 11.3 | 63.5% |
| Sutter County | 89 | 10.9 | 80.0% |
| Madera County | 87 | 10.0 | 52.2% |
| Stanislaus County | 406 | 9.1 | 80.4% |
Community comparison
Counts use active individual NPI records with a dental taxonomy and a matching California practice-location city. Directory practices are shown separately for navigation.
Incorporated city · Population 9,755
Incorporated city · Population 71,572
Method
Use CMS NPPES NPI-1 records with a California practice location.
Retain active records whose taxonomy code begins with 1223.
Match each practice-location city to one of the 2 places in this report.
Divide each record count by that community's published population.
Show directory office profiles as a distinct navigation count.
Primary sources
Provider and taxonomy snapshot collected September 15, 2026.
January 1, 2026 city and county estimates; 2020 Census populations for census-designated places.
Dental shortage designations dated September 1, 2026.
Find an office
Practice profiles include locations, contact details, services, and other sourced information where available.
Questions about the report