55.7%
of records are in Roseville
Roseville holds more than half of the county total. Auburn's rate is much higher than the other five communities, so counts and rates tell different parts of the local picture.
Placer County · provider records and access indicators
Roseville has the largest provider count, but Auburn has the highest recorded rate in the entire 18-county footprint. That rate reflects Auburn's smaller population as well as its 59 provider records.
Key findings
55.7%
Roseville holds more than half of the county total. Auburn's rate is much higher than the other five communities, so counts and rates tell different parts of the local picture.
73.4%
The six tracked communities represent nearly three-quarters of Placer County residents. Mountain and untracked communities remain outside the calculation.
61
All six specialist groups appear. Orthodontics leads the specialist count, followed by periodontics and endodontics.
Where records are located
The bars compare active NPI-1 records per 10,000 residents. A higher registry rate does not establish shorter waits, broader insurance participation, or more available appointments.
Population scope
The six tracked communities represent nearly three-quarters of Placer County residents. Mountain and untracked communities remain outside the calculation.
The numerator and denominator cover the same named communities. Using the full county population with this partial location count would understate the rate.
The calculation does not measure appointment capacity, patient travel, office hours, insurance participation, or dentists who serve county residents from another city.
Specialty record
All six specialist groups appear. Orthodontics leads the specialist count, followed by periodontics and endodontics.
These categories come from provider-selected NPPES taxonomies. They are not a count of specialists accepting patients.
Federal shortage context
1
HRSA shortage designations use federal criteria and can apply to an area, a population group, or a facility. They complement the city-level NPI count but do not use the same denominator.
Review the HRSA source ↗Regional context
Placer County ranks 2 of 18 current county reports by combined provider-record rate.
This is context, not a quality ranking. Each county rate covers only the named communities shown in its report, and population coverage varies.
| County report | Records | Per 10k | Population covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tehama County | 41 | 17.8 | 35.6% |
| Placer County | 415 | 13.0 | 73.4% |
| Butte County | 176 | 11.8 | 71.2% |
| Sacramento County | 1,206 | 11.8 | 63.0% |
| Shasta County | 131 | 11.3 | 63.5% |
Community comparison
Counts use active individual NPI records with a dental taxonomy and a matching California practice-location city. Directory practices are shown separately for navigation.
Incorporated city · Population 13,506
Incorporated city · Population 2,020
Incorporated city · Population 56,494
Incorporated city · Population 6,822
Incorporated city · Population 74,842
Incorporated city · Population 165,455
Method
Use CMS NPPES NPI-1 records with a California practice location.
Retain active records whose taxonomy code begins with 1223.
Match each practice-location city to one of the 6 places in this report.
Divide each record count by that community's published population.
Show directory office profiles as a distinct navigation count.
Primary sources
Provider and taxonomy snapshot collected September 15, 2026.
January 1, 2026 city and county estimates; 2020 Census populations for census-designated places.
Dental shortage designations dated September 1, 2026.
Find an office
Practice profiles include locations, contact details, services, and other sourced information where available.
Questions about the report